Biography
Joel M. Sweet is a litigator with decades of experience combatting fraud against consumers and federal programs. After 21 years serving as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Mr. Sweet returned to Berger Montague to continue pursuing justice for consumers, investors, and borrowers, and to protect taxpayer dollars from fraud on government programs through the representation of whistleblowers.
As a federal prosecutor, Mr. Sweet developed innovative strategies to identify financial institutions and illegal third-party payment processors complicit in consumer fraud and abuse. After successful criminal and civil prosecutions against several banks and third-party payment processors, the Attorney General selected Mr. Sweet to design and lead an aggressive national consumer protection initiative. Working from the Department of Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch, Mr. Sweet led a team of prosecutors and law enforcement agents in an effort described in a New York Times editorial as an “important strategy designed to protect depositors from unauthorized withdrawals from their banks accounts.”
Mr. Sweet’s team’s efforts led to a large number of civil settlements, criminal prosecutions, and the recovery of tens of millions of dollars for fraud victims. The initiative led to hundreds of domestic and foreign fraudsters, many of whom preyed on elderly victims, being cut off from access to the U.S. banking system.
Mr. Sweet’s efforts combatting consumer fraud have been recognized by courts in private litigation. In Faloney v. Wachovia in a class action in which victims received $170 million, the court stated: “The suit commenced by Faloney is indirectly related to the government’s PPC investigation and is based in large part on evidence unearthed by Assistant United States Attorney Sweet’s dogged pursuit of PPC, Wachovia, and the telemarketing industry.” 254 F.R.D. 204 (E.D. Pa. 2008). Mr. Sweet’s efforts on behalf of consumers also includes groundbreaking criminal prosecutions of illegal online payday lenders under RICO’s loansharking provision.
As an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Mr. Sweet represented the United States in hundreds of matters in federal courts. Mr. Sweet led dozens of False Claims Act investigations and litigation concerning misconduct by health care companies, defense contractors, and other federal contractors and grantees, resulting in the recovery of hundreds of millions of dollars for American taxpayers.
Mr. Sweet’s efforts included the prosecution of a war profiteering foreign company that settled civil claims and pleaded guilty to criminal charges for defrauding the Department of Defense in connection with the provision of food and water to United States forces in Afghanistan. Mr. Sweet also investigated and resolved claims against a major aerospace contractor that allegedly failed to comply with critical testing specifications in the manufacture of American warplanes, and also claims against a manufacturer of munitions sold to the U.S. Army.
Mr. Sweet has represented the United States in hundreds of cases brought against the United States in federal court. These include wrongful death, medical malpractice, constitutional tort, personal injury, employment discrimination, immigration, and other types of cases. In a unique matter, Mr. Sweet successfully represented the United States in a case concerning the ownership of ten 1933 Double Eagles – the last gold coins minted by the United States – that were stolen from the Mint in Philadelphia in 1933 and recovered by the United States in 2005.
Mr. Sweet received numerous awards during his service as a federal prosecutor, including the Department of Defense Inspector General’s Award for Excellence, an Award of Appreciation for Extraordinary Service from the Department of the Treasury, and commendations from other federal agencies, including the United States Secret Service, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Department of Justice. Mr. Sweet twice was nominated for the Department of Justice’s highest award – the Attorney General’s Award.
Mr. Sweet served as an adjunct professor of law teaching Health Care Fraud and Abuse at Villanova University’s Charles Widger School of Law and at Drexel University’s Kline School of Law, and as an adjunct clinical professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Carey School of Law. For several years, Mr. Sweet was an instructor at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s training center for federal and state bank regulators, where he lectured on identifying and addressing consumer fraud. Mr. Sweet also has served on several Department of Justice task forces addressing mass market consumer fraud, including the Consumer Protection Working Group of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.
Mr. Sweet is a cum laude graduate of Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, where he served on the Law Review and received the Kranzel Award for the bet paper in state, local, or health law, among other awards. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree with distinction from George Washington University’s Elliot School of International Affairs. Before attending law school, Mr. Sweet served as a Political Information Officer at the Embassy of Israel in Washington, D.C, and ran a large poultry farm on a Kibbutz in northern Israel. Prior to his government service, Mr. Sweet also practiced law at a large Philadelphia-based law firm.
Mr. Sweet is immensely proud of his two children, both of whom are teachers. He lives in Philadelphia with two rescue dogs, Louie and Stewie, neither of whom has anything much to teach. Mr. Sweet has three times cycled from Jerusalem to the Red Sea city of Eilat in Israel to support environmental and co-existence efforts in the Middle East.
Representative Cases
United States v. The Boeing Company, Civil Action No. 16-cv-6547 (E.D. Pa.) (obtained $8.1 million settlement for alleged false claims in connection with manufacture of Osprey V-22 tilt-rotor aircraft)
United States ex rel. Srivastava v. Trident USA Health Services LLC et al., Civil Action No. 16-cv-2956 (E.D. Pa.) (obtained $8.5 million settlement for alleged illegal “swapping” arrangements under which company provided mobile x-rays to skilled nursing facilities at prices below costs or below fair market value for purpose of inducing the facilities to refer lucrative federal health program business)
United States v. Hallinan et al., Criminal No. 16-cr-00130 (E.D. Pa.) (obtained convictions of “godfather” of illegal online payday lending and his lawyer for conspiracy to violate RICO and international money laundering, resulting in sentences of imprisonment of 14 years and 8 years, respectively, and forfeiture of more than $40 million)
United States v. Rubin et al., Criminal Action No. 15-cr-0038 (E.D. Pa.) (obtained first ever convictions under RICO’s loan sharking provision for illegal online payday lending, and conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud for telemarketing scam with more than 70,000 victims, resulting in 37-month imprisonment sentence for ringleader and more than $9 million in forfeiture)
United States v. Four Oaks Bank, Civil Action No. 14-cv-00014 (E.D.N.C.) (obtained $1.2 million settlement for claim that bank deliberately ignored and allowed access to national banking system to further a scheme to defraud consumers)
U.S. v. First Bank of Delaware, Civil Action No.12-cv-6500 (E.D. Pa.) (obtained $15.5 million settlement for claim that bank knowingly serviced consumer fraudsters)
U.S. v. Zions Bank, Civil Action No.12 -cv-6500 (E.D. Pa.) (obtained $3.6 million settlement for claim that bank and affiliated payment processor facilitated consumer fraud by providing payment processing services to telemarketing and Internet merchants that were debiting money illegally from consumers’ bank accounts).
United States v. Hellinger et al., Criminal Action No. 011-cr-00083 (obtained convictions of six owners and managers of illegal payment processor servicing fraudsters charged with operating illegal money transmission business)
United States v. Wachovia Bank NA, Case No. 10-20165 (S.D. Fla.) (obtained $160 million in forfeiture and penalties, and deferred prosecution agreement, in part for bank’s failure to identify, detect, and report the suspicious transactions in the third-party payment processor accounts, as required by the Bank Secrecy Act, due to deficiencies in its anti-money laundering program)
United States ex rel. Epp v. Supreme Foodservice AG, et al., Civil Action No. 10-cv-1134 (E.D. Pa.) (obtained civil settlement, which along with corporate criminal guilty plea, resolved claims against a war profiteering foreign company that defrauded the Department of Defense in connection with the provision of food and water to United States forces in Afghanistan, resulting in civil, criminal, and administrative recoveries totaling more than $400 million)
United States v. Hesco (obtained pre-suit $2.1 settlement resolving alleged overcharges and false claims for international transportation of blast walls designed to protect U.S. service members and civilians)
United States v. Payment Processing Center et al., Civil Action No. 06-cv- 00725 (E.D. Pa.) (obtained temporary restraining order, permanent injunction, $6 million in asset restraints, and imposition of receiver against third-party payment processor, for illegally withdrawing more than $60 million from consumers bank accounts)
United States v. Bindley-Cardinal Health (obtained pre-suit $5.5 million settlement with to resolve allegations of drug pricing false claims by pharmaceutical distributor)
United States v. Big Brothers Big Sisters (obtained pre-suit $1.6 million settlement resolving alleged grant fraud claims)
Langbord v. United States, Civil Action No. 06-cv-05315 (E.D. Pa.) (represented United States in litigation concerning the ownership of ten 1933 Double Eagles – the last gold coins minted by the United States – which were stolen from the Mint in 1933 and recovered by the United States in 2005).
DeJesus v. United States, Civil Action No. 02-cv-00253 (E.D. Pa.) (represented United States in wrongful death suit after a Department of Veterans Affairs psychiatric hospital discharged a mentally ill veteran who shot and killed two of his children, and two other children, before shooting himself).
In re: Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation, 105 F. Supp. 2d 139 (2000) (E.D.N.Y.) ($1.25 billion settlement with Switzerland’s three largest banks alleged to have illegally retained Holocaust victims’ assets deposited at the banks, and laundered Jewish communal assets plundered by Nazis and their allies)

"*" indicates required fields
By clicking SUBMIT you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and you are providing express consent to receive communications from Berger Montague via calls, emails, and/or text messages.