Overview

Case Number: No. 26-2113 (8th Cir.); D.S.D. No. 5:26-cv-05030-RAL

Practice Area: Appeals & Complex Briefing Commercial Litigation

Case Status: Pending

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

The U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota ordered Mr. Morozov’s release, and the government has appealed to the Eighth Circuit. Amici argue that due process is inherently an individualized inquiry, and that the government’s mandatory, process-free detention of noncitizens under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) cannot be reconciled with due process where, as here, the government previously made an individualized finding that the person poses no flight risk or danger.

Berger Montague is one of the nation’s preeminent law firms focusing on complex civil litigation, class actions, whistleblower cases, and mass torts in federal and state courts throughout the United States. With nearly $2.4 billion in 2025 post-trial judgments alone, the Firm is a leader in the fields of complex litigation, antitrust, consumer protection, defective products, environmental law, employment law, securities, and whistleblower cases, among other practice areas. For over 55 years, Berger Montague has played leading roles in precedent-setting cases and has recovered over $50 billion for its clients and the classes they have represented. Berger Montague is headquartered in Philadelphia and has offices in Chicago; Malvern, PA; Minneapolis; San Diego; San Francisco; Toronto, Canada; Washington, D.C., and Wilmington, DE.  

Important Documents

Morozov v. Warden, Lawrence County Jail, et al. FAQs

What is this case about?

This case asks whether the Due Process Clause permits the government to re-detain a noncitizen — without new evidence, a hearing, or any change in circumstances — after he was paroled and individually found to pose no flight risk or danger. Amici, several immigrant and detainee rights organizations, argue that due process requires an individualized inquiry before the government can strip someone of that liberty a second time, and that mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) cannot be justified on a categorical basis.

What is Berger Montague’s role in this case?

E. Michelle Drake of Berger Montague’s Minneapolis office serves as counsel of record for Amici Curiae The Advocates for Human Rights, the Federal Immigration Litigation Clinic, the Detainee Rights Clinic, the Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota, and Mid-Minnesota Legal Aid’s Immigration Law Project. On September 16, 2026, Berger Montague filed a brief on Amici’s behalf in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit supporting Petitioner-Appellee Aleksei Morozov.

What happens next?

The Eighth Circuit will consider briefing from Mr. Morozov, the government, and Amici before scheduling oral argument and issuing a decision. Berger Montague will continue to monitor the appeal and update this page as it progresses.

Contact UsFree Case Evaluation

"*" indicates required fields

By clicking SUBMIT you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and you are providing express consent to receive communications from Berger Montague via calls, emails, and/or text messages. We reserve the right to collect, retain and use the data you provide.

On the Cutting Edge of the Profession

Legal Intelligencer