Cases & Investigations

In re Loestrin 24 Fe Antitrust Lawsuit

CASE NUMBER: 13-md-2472
PRACTICE AREAS: Antitrust
PRODUCT: Loestrin 24 Fe, a prescription birth control
CASE STATUS: Pending
COURT: United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island

Berger & Montague is co-lead class counsel in a challenge to a pay-for-delay deal for the birth control medication Loestrin 24 Fe.

Berger & Montague represents a proposed class of direct purchasers of Warner Chilcott’s oral contraceptive drug Loestrin 24 Fe.  Plaintiffs allege that Warner Chilcott and its would-be generic competitors entered into an unlawful “product hop” and a pay-for-delay conspiracy that prevented purchasers from benefiting from earlier, unconstrained, lower priced generic competition.

About the case

On September 4, 2014, the district court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss.  Plaintiffs appealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.  The Court of Appeals held oral argument in December 2015 at which the Federal Trade Commission also appeared and argued in support of the plaintiffs.  Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission, nearly 30 states, several public interest groups, and various major retailers filed amicus briefs in support of the plaintiffs.  On February 22, 2016, the Court of Appeals vacated the district court’s dismissal and remanded the case for further proceedings. See In re Loestrin 24 Fe Antitrust Litigation, 842 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 2016).

Lead Attorneys: David F. Sorensen, Daniel Walker, and Zachary D. Caplan

Lead Attorneys

David Sorensen Headshot

David F. Sorensen

Managing Shareholder
Daniel Walker Headshot

Daniel Walker

Shareholder

Associates

Request A Free Consultation

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.